Stat Overflow is aimed at researchers who are looking for practical and easily implementable statistical tips to enhance the quality of their research.
Are you ready to become an expert researcher? Subscribe to our mailing list and we will keep you up-to-date on all the latest best practices in research statistics.
June 10, 2021, 7:34 p.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Those of us who do research in more than one language are often at a crossroad when we find the right survey tool in the wrong language. Should we translate the tool to the language we need? Or, is it better to just create our own tool? Whether you … more
May 13, 2021, 9:41 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
The most critical skill for creating a high-impact Delphi study is the ability to write powerful statements. Taking a few moments to learn how to write statements correctly will save hours of time and can increase the quality of your research remarkably. It can also save your project from … more
April 6, 2021, 9:22 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Whether you are a scientist, innovator, software engineer, or any other species of researcher, "Our study shows a strong correlation between this and that," is one of the most sought after statistical conclusions. Often the entire purpose of the research project is to show that two variables are related … more
March 22, 2021, 8:30 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Mention the word ethics to a researcher, and it is quite probable that you will hear a groan, or at least get a raised eyebrow. For many researchers, ethics has become an unwelcome obstacle that appears to rise from nowhere and stands between the researcher and the research. Sadly, … more
March 7, 2021, midnight, by Jeffrey Franc
What can researchers and scientists learn from U/X designers? Are the basic principles of User Experience design the same as the basic principles of designing a research project?
Consider the story of two (fictitious) experts in the field of U/X design and engineering research.
Amiyah … more
Feb. 14, 2021, noon, by Jeffrey Franc
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are optimal ways to amalgamate data from many studies and translate them into usable knowledge. And the number of published systematic reviews has increased by an order of magnitude over the past decade. However, systematic reviews are vitally dependent on the quality of work done … more
Jan. 27, 2021, 12:01 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
What will it be like to be a researcher in 2021? 2020 certainly brought a huge number of changes for all of us, and 2021 promises to do the same. As the first month of 2021 is coming to a close, how are we as researchers to cope with … more
Jan. 3, 2021, 8 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Whether you are assessing the effect of a new fertilizer on crop yields, the safety of a new drug, the influence of a teaching intervention on test scores, or the effect of smart home technology on electricity consumption, randomized experiments are the best way to prove that your idea … more
Nov. 29, 2020, 9:38 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
In our latest webinar, our guests, Pier Luigi Ingrassia (CeSi) and Luca Ragazzoni (CRIMEDIM) spoke about their experiences in 2020, and their predictions for 2021. Both admitted that 2020 had been a difficult year for research. Many advisors were extremely busy with their clinical duties and had much less … more
Nov. 12, 2020, 8:45 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
There are four situations when peer reviewers shouldn't talk about power. If you are currently reviewing manuscripts before publication, avoiding talking about power in these four situations will make you a top-notch reviewer who provides constructive, actionable advice to the researchers.
For excellent reasons, talking about more
Oct. 17, 2020, 7:01 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Separating correlation from causation can be tricky. However, this distinction is vitally important for interpretation of any statistics. It is all too easy - and counterproductive - to make changes to a process when correlation has been misinterpreted as causation. Using the three established criteria of association, temporality, and … more
Oct. 4, 2020, 7:40 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
I had a chance to speak with one of my first mentors in emergency medicine, Dr Eddy Lang: the Academic and Clinical Department Head and a Professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine, at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. He has extensive experience in research at … more
Sept. 20, 2020, 6:30 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
When required to do a student research project or a thesis it is very common for student's to face an immediate road block. In some cases, the student quickly creates a multitude or research topics, and it can be very difficult to select the best. In other cases, there … more
Sept. 5, 2020, 3:07 p.m., by Jeffrey FrancBecoming a truly effective advisor for a thesis or student research project takes more than just dedication. Over the past 20 years, I have had the opportunity to work with dozens of research advisors as they have supervised student research projects and theses. Simply being an expert on a topic … more
Aug. 10, 2020, 10:37 a.m., by Jeffrey FrancWhen it comes time to write the discussion of your paper, what should you say about the sample size? In many cases it is tempting to write the common phrase "as the sample size was small, clearly further research is needed." But, was that the correct thing to write? In … more
July 19, 2020, 8 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
It is often said that most scientific hypotheses are false. However, publishing an article when the results are negative can be a challenge for even the best researchers. The simple existence of a non-significant p-value, or a wide confidence interval is often the death of a paper. And, there … more
June 27, 2020, 7:57 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Have you ever been a victim of the Likert Crush? Many of us have. This is when you develop a great survey tool, administer the questionnaire, collect the data, analyze the data, and send it away for peer review... only to get a fast response critiquing your analysis of … more
June 24, 2020, 11:59 p.m., by Jeffrey Franc
When talking about experimental designs do you ever get bewildered by the terms response, factor, and level? If so you are not alone. However, getting the definition of these terms is absolutely critical to ensure that the experimental design is not ruined in the initial planning and execution phases. … more
April 11, 2020, 1:02 p.m., by Jeffrey Franc
As COVID-19 engulfs our planet the medical community is struggling to save thousands of victims from premature death. High-quality research published quickly is mandatory to provide the best care. Researchers, journal editors, and clinicians are all working together.
This week I had a chance to chat with one of my … more
Oct. 18, 2019, 9:45 a.m., by Jeffrey Franc
The last several years have been unkind to the p-value. Formerly the star quarterback of the statistics team, the p-value is being pushed off the field and is spending more time hanging out on the sidelines.
Some researchers suggest that we abandon p-values completely. Most statisticians will probably suggest a … more
Oct. 1, 2019, midnight, by Jeffrey Franc
As a statistician my primary goal in all studies is to enable the content expert – the researcher – to develop the best results from their work. Often this means helping the researcher to get higher on the evidence-based medicine pyramid. Aiming for the top placed randomized experiment. Unfortunately, the … more
Sept. 5, 2019, 12:30 p.m., by Jeffrey Franc
Although tabulating your research data seems like an easy task, statisticians need your data in a very specific form to analyze it. Following these eight simple rules will keep from wasting your time on data tabulation.
To busy to read the entire article? Skip to the end to see how … more
Sept. 8, 2018, 9:31 a.m., by Admin Admin
If you are using surveys for research, these ten problems may be costing you dearly in time and money.
Need a fast way to become an instant survey design expert? Download our survey design checklist.
Here they are, ten rules for designing a survey:
May 5, 2018, 1:35 p.m., by Jeffrey Franc
A great introduction can be key to winning at the peer-review process, and should answer three questions: 1-“What are you trying to prove?” 2-“Who Cares?” 3-“Could this possibly be true?”
Whether you like the peer review process or not, it is probable that for the present and near future peer … more
Sept. 25, 2017, 10:17 p.m., by Jeffrey FrancNeed help with your peer review process? The Stat59 blog is here for you? Send us your questions about the peer review process and we will try to answer them here on the blog. Email us with a copy of your draft manuscript, a copy of the peer … more